Preparing for Q-Day
And in the meantime, what is everyone else doing.
Good Morning. US stocks reached record highs on Wednesday as investors responded to optimism from Donald Trump that the Iran conflict could end soon.
Gains were driven by megacap technology stocks, with Microsoft jumping 4% and Tesla rising 7%. Investors are now watching for developments in US-Iran talks that could support further market momentum. Attention is also turning to earnings, as Bank of America and Morgan Stanley both reported results that beat expectations.
Crypto markets were volatile but overall rebounding over the past week. Bitcoin climbed toward $75K–$76K with strong inflows and improving sentiment, while Ethereum jumped sharply, gaining roughly double digits at one point.
Today, we take a look at the latest for Kraken’s IPO plans and how JPMorgan Chase is doubling down on blockchain, signaling where the future of finance may be headed. We also take a peak at quantum computing and what could possibly happen on ‘q’ day.
Crypto News You Can’t Miss: Kraken IPO
Kraken has confirmed it quietly filed for a U.S. IPO back in late 2025, but the timeline is still uncertain as market conditions shift. Its valuation has dropped to about $13.3 billion from $20 billion after the crypto downturn, though a recent $200 million investment from Deutsche Börse suggests strong ongoing institutional interest and values the company at that lower level.
The Deutsche Börse deal is part of a broader strategy to connect traditional finance with crypto, including trading, custody, and tokenized assets, showing how legacy financial firms are increasingly moving into digital assets.
Despite earlier delays due to a crypto market slump, Kraken is still positioning itself for a public listing while expanding its business, including offering more advanced, institutional-style trading tools and gaining direct access to U.S. payment systems through the Federal Reserve.
What is JP Morgan Building on the Blockchain?
JPMorgan Chase gave investors a reminder this week that it remains the most important bank in the United States not only because of its scale, but because of its ability to turn strong market conditions into strategic investment. Their Q1 performance numbers, released this week, were impressive: fixed income trading revenue rose 21% in the first quarter, helping drive a 13% increase in profit and a 20% rise in total markets revenue. In a quarter shaped by volatility across commodities, credit, currencies, and emerging markets, the bank once again showed that it can monetize complexity better than almost anyone else on Wall Street.
That matters for blockchain because JPMorgan is not approaching digital assets from a position of weakness or desperation. It is doing so from a position of strength. Unlike smaller firms that turned to crypto in search of growth, JPMorgan is expanding into blockchain while its core businesses are already producing powerful earnings. That makes its blockchain strategy more credible. When a bank with this level of earnings power decides to invest in tokenization, on chain settlement, and digital forms of bank money, markets should assume it is thinking in decades, not quarters.
The clearest signal is that JPMorgan no longer treats blockchain as a side experiment. Its former Onyx business has been rebranded as Kinexys, and the language around that rebrand is telling. JPMorgan says Kinexys is designed to “reimagine the way money, assets and financial information move,” and to accelerate blockchain and tokenization into mainstream finance. That is not the language of a research lab. It is the language of infrastructure. In effect, JPMorgan is trying to build the rails for a financial system in which payments, collateral, fund shares, and other financial claims can move faster and with fewer frictions than they do today.
What is especially notable is that the strategy is broad. JPMorgan is working on blockchain based payments through JPM Coin and related deposit token products. It is building tokenized collateral tools through its Tokenized Collateral Network. It is also helping push tokenized money market funds into more practical institutional use. Its own materials describe tokenized money market funds as a meaningful next step in liquidity management, especially when combined with on chain money and delivery versus payment settlement. In plain English, JPMorgan appears to believe that tokenization works best when the cash leg, the collateral leg, and the asset leg are all redesigned together.
This is why the Ethereum connection matters. For years, large banks often sounded interested in blockchain while keeping public chains at arm’s length. JPMorgan still prefers permissioned systems for many institutional use cases, but it has moved closer to Ethereum’s orbit. The firm piloted a USD deposit token on Base, an Ethereum Layer 2 network, and its public materials explicitly discuss Ethereum and Layer 2 networks as part of the digital asset landscape institutions now need to understand. This does not mean JPMorgan is becoming a crypto native company. It means the bank increasingly sees public blockchain infrastructure as something that can be selectively used for regulated financial products.
That distinction is important. JPMorgan’s real interest is not retail speculation. It is institutional plumbing. The bank is trying to solve old financial problems with new technology: trapped liquidity, slow collateral mobility, limited settlement windows, fragmented ledgers, and operational friction across borders and time zones. Its blockchain products are aimed at making money and assets programmable, movable around the clock, and easier to integrate into treasury and capital markets workflows. Reuters’ reporting on Axis Bank’s use of Kinexys for anytime dollar payments shows that this strategy is already being exported into real cross border commercial use cases.
Because JPMorgan is the leading U.S. bank, its choices are unlikely to remain isolated. Other major banks do not need to copy every product, but they will have a hard time ignoring the direction of travel if JPMorgan proves that tokenized deposits, tokenized funds, and blockchain based settlement can lower costs or deepen client relationships. Large banks tend to follow one another when a new model begins to look operationally useful and regulatorily manageable. JPMorgan’s moves therefore matter not just because of what they say about one bank, but because they may preview where wholesale banking is headed more broadly. That conclusion is an inference, but it is a reasonable one given JPMorgan’s scale in payments, securities services, and institutional banking.
The larger point is that blockchain adoption in banking may not arrive in the form many expected. It may not begin with consumers trading tokens in bank apps. Instead, it may come through the quiet redesign of core infrastructure by the biggest institutions in finance. JPMorgan’s first quarter results show it has the earnings engine to invest heavily in that future, and Kinexys shows it increasingly has the ambition. If that model works, the next phase of blockchain adoption may be shaped less by crypto startups challenging banks and more by banks absorbing blockchain into the machinery of modern finance.
Media of the Week: Quantum Computing & Crypto
Head of Capital Markets at FalconX, Joshua Lim, wrote a thread on x about the implications of quantum computing. As he writes below, “Q-Day” in crypto refers to a future point when quantum computers become powerful enough to break the cryptography securing blockchains. Using techniques like Shor’s algorithm, attackers could potentially derive private keys and access funds. It’s a theoretical risk for now, but it’s driving efforts to develop quantum-resistant security. Take a look at his deep dive below.
Q-Day is probably the most under-discussed systemic risk in crypto right now. Everyone's focused on regulatory pressure and market cycles, but the cryptographic foundation that blockchain security rests on is genuinely vulnerable to sufficiently advanced quantum computing. The honest answer to "what is everyone else doing" is mostly: not much, not fast enough. Post-quantum cryptography standards from NIST have been finalized, but upgrading live blockchain networks to use them is a coordination problem that nobody has cleanly solved yet. Bitcoin and Ethereum both have theoretical migration paths but the actual implementation requires protocol-level consensus that historically takes years. The projects that are taking this seriously now are building in a time advantage, but the broader ecosystem needs a sharper sense of urgency on this. A harvest-now-decrypt-later attack on today's transactions is already a viable strategy for nation-state actors with quantum access.